Agree Agree:  10
Likes Likes:  7
Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 46 to 48 of 48
  1. #46
    Director of Nothing
    Forum Moderator

    Awards Showcase

    mmmm8's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    New York, New York, United States
    Posts
    52,099

    Re: ATP M1000 Paris 11/2 - 11/8 2020

    RESULTS
    Singles - Final
    [3] D. Medvedev (RUS)
    d [4] A. Zverev (GER) 57 64 61

    Doubles - Final
    F. Auger-Aliassime (CAN) / H. Hurkacz (POL)
    d [2] M. Pavic (CRO) / B. Soares (BRA) 67(3) 76(7) 10-2


  2. #47

    Re: ATP M1000 Paris 11/2 - 11/8 2020

    About MS1000's VS Slams. Winning ONE slam is more difficult. 5 setters, and all players below the 100 cut off point.
    But I will admit that there is one exception (perhaps). Winning the CANADA/CINCY double is harder. It is two weeks on hard courts, but you need to play 10 matches. That one is really tough.
    Face it. It's the apocalypse.

  3. #48

    Re: ATP M1000 Paris 11/2 - 11/8 2020

    Quote Originally Posted by Pattyfan View Post
    ON TC today the commentators were saying that many people feel winning a Masters 1000 is actually tougher than winning a slam. I'd love to see the average ranking of let's say Nole, Rafa and Fed's opponents in a slam and then in a Masters 1000. It's fewer rounds, but I think maybe the quality of the opponent is on the average higher, even if you take away the first two rounds of the slam. Those rounds give opponents the chance to lose early. and of course, what Megan said.

    Kevin
    Yeah, this has been a debate for awhile. At a Masters, players have to hit the ground running because the first opponent can be pretty highly ranked. And upsets are easier in best-of-three. And finally, playing consecutive days (though top players who start on Tuesday would get Wed or Thurs off). But Slams are more physical and can be more pressure for some players, as someone else noted. And winning 7 matches is, by definition, harder than winning 5. Two more chances for an off day, an injury, a distraction, a zoning opponent...

    Playing 5 best-of-three matches over 5-7 days in a Masters shouldn't be that physically tough for these guys, especially if they get a few routine wins along the way. A few grueling five-setters at a Slam sounds much harder. Winning 21 sets versus 10 sets sounds harder. But I'm sure it varies by player.
    Last edited by MeganFernandez; 11-09-2020 at 12:15 PM.
    Sometimes you're the windshield, sometimes you're the bug.

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •