Tennis Random, Random

[morct]

Good ole Patty.

[Ti-Amie]

Brian Baker is living proof that persistence pays off, providing tennis one of the most inspirational stories it has seen in recent years. The American, who turns 27 on Monday, clinched the USTA’s Roland Garros wild card berth this weekend en route to capturing the Savannah Challenger.

A promising talent who reached the Roland Garros junior final in 2003 (l. to Wawrinka), Baker saw his career derailed by a string of injuries following his coming out party at the 2005 US Open, where he stunned ninth-ranked Gaston Gaudio in the first round.

Having spent nearly six years away from the game, the Nashville native began his comeback bid in July 2011 by winning a Futures event in Pittsburgh, and hasn’t looked back. After qualifying at the Sarasota Challenger last week, where he reached the second round, Baker came through the qualifying again, winning eight matches in Savannah to secure his place in Paris.

ATPWorldTour.com caught up with Baker following his triumph in Georgia, discussing the incredible achievement, his injury struggles and his decision to return to the sport.

Do you feel like this is the beginning of a Hollywood movie script with your 27th birthday coming tomorrow? What went through your mind when you clinched the wild card on Saturday in Savannah?

I don’t know if I would say it’s a movie script, but I’m really excited to have some success in my second go around. I feel like it’s more of a ‘career revival’ kind of thing. Yesterday, going into the match, I knew the winner was going to get the wild card, so I had extra motivation and was very pleased with my performance. I was definitely more pumped up when the last ball when out than I would be in a normal match.

You've defeated quality players, such as Ryan Sweeting, Michael Russell and Robby Ginepri in the two Challenger events to earn the wild card. Which area of your game has presented the biggest challenge to your opposition?
I think it’s been a combination of things. I think my return is one of my strong suits. And on clay, that’s a big advantage. I also feel like I’ve played pretty solid. I haven’t been giving away many free points, so guys have had to work pretty hard to win each point.

Where does your title run in Savannah rank in comparison to some of your 'Career: Part One' achievements?
It’s up there. I still think my victory over Gaudio at the US Open would be number one, against a guy ranked in the Top 10. This is right up there with my first Challenger title in Denver in 2004. The first one is always special, but this one is almost another first one, because I basically took off six years.

The last time you played a full season was in 2005, having played two Challengers in 2007. What made you decide to give your calling another chance last summer in Pennsylvania?

I felt like I had some unfinished business. My body was the main factor was why I took off. I always wanted to come back but my body wouldn’t allow me to. I started to feel a little bit better last summer, so I told myself to give it a go and see how far I can take it. I’ve had some ups and downs since coming back, but right now, it probably feels better than it has in a long time.

Walk us through your injuries, having had multiple hip surgeries and reconstructive surgery on your elbow.
I’ve had five surgeries. I had the left hip in 2005 after the US Open, sports hernia in 2006, left hip again, the right hip and the elbow surgery all in 2008.

It seems very uncommon for athletes outside of baseball to have Tommy John surgery on the elbow. Had you heard of athletes from different sports getting it before you went in?
I hadn’t heard of it either. When I talked to Dr. Andrews, who did my surgery, he said he had done over 1300 of them but on tennis players, had only done five or six.

How cautious have you been in your comeback in not pushing too hard? Have you adapted your style of play as a result?

I’ve had to tone back my tournaments. Last year, I think I only played five times. I had to pull out of a semi-final at a Futures event in October because my shoulder was sore. I knew if I played, I’d probably be out for a couple months. I’m definitely listening to my body now and not taking any chances.

As far as adapting, I haven’t really. I try to play as hard as I can. If you’re not going 100 per cent healthy, you’re not going to be able to play that well. It’s more about trying to take care of my body in every way I can, not really adjusting how I play. I’ve changed how I train, not putting as much stress on the body. In this game, with how physical it is, you have to be in great shape to compete at the top level.

When you were out of the game, how hard was it to see players like Jo-Wilfried Tsonga, Tomas Berdych, Gael Monfils and Marcos Baghdatis develop into elite stars on the ATP World Tour, knowing you beat them in the juniors and might have been on a similar track had it not been for your misfortunes?

You try not to play that guessing game on what could have been. I’m not going to lie. I was pretty disappointed when I had to sit out all that time. It was pretty tough to watch all the guys on TV having tons of success. I had to learn to deal with it. You can’t fight the things you can’t control. I tried to stay positive and hoped that one day I would be able to give it another go. Do I wish that this would have never happened and been able to play right through? Of course. But that’s not the case, so I had to take it in stride and make the best of the situation.

Why did you decide to enrol at Belmont University?

I would have started earlier if I’d known all my surgeries would have kept me out that long. I was always trying to rehab quickly. I started in the fall of 2008 and went until last summer, taking normal student hours. I also was the assistant coach of the tennis team.

You're travelling without a coach. Are you looking to bring someone on board in the near future?

For right now, there’s no one I have in mind to go after. At some point, that might be the next step. I feel I’d be more inclined to hire someone who is more of a physio/trainer to travel with me before I get a coach, because my body right now is the most important thing to my success.

Your appearance in Paris will be your first Grand Slam main draw outside of the US Open. What are you looking forward to most about playing at Roland Garros?

Starting off, I’ve had good memories there. I got to the final as a junior and I like the clay over there. I didn’t grow up playing on clay, but I’ve had some of my best results on it. It’s going to be a lot of fun. Anytime you can play in a Grand Slam, it’s a special moment. This is the reason why I came back and tried to play again. I wasn’t coming back to try and get into the Top 200. I came back to play in Grand Slams. It might have happened a little sooner than expected, but I’m excited to try and have a good result.

With your recent success, how are you approaching the rest of the season? Do you have any specific goals in mind?

I haven’t sat down and thought about many performance-based goals. Now that the body is feeling better and I’ve proven to myself that I can play eight matches in a week, staying relatively healthy, I’ll have to think of some goals. For the rest of the season, I’m going to look to keep the wave of momentum going. I don’t have an exact ranking I’m looking to get to, but it would be great to crack the Top 150, even Top 100, if I keep playing well.

Who would you like to thank for getting you to where you are today?
There are so many people I can thank. My parents have always been behind me from day one, when I decided to turn pro instead of going to college. They’ve always been in my corner and supported everything I’ve wanted to do. My dad was my first coach, so he’s been instrumental in my tennis. My girlfriend has been supportive through this, especially with all the travel and training and me being away often. Coach Jim Madrigal from Belmont has been huge. He’s always been one of my biggest fans in Nashville. I feel like the whole national tennis community has been behind me, because they know how much this means to me to be able to play at a high level. I’ve had an overwhelming amount of support since I came back.

http://www.atpworldtour.com/News/Ten...Wild-Card.aspx

[Moose]

(interesting eulogy for Sania's singles career. Not sure I agree with all the writer's points - but she did start out incredibly promising, and it has to be heartbreaking to her fans that she never achieved in singles the kind of successes I think many people expected)


The end of the Sania Mirza dream
by Ashish Magotra Apr 30, 2012

Last week, Sania Mirza confirmed that she has given up playing singles. The news didn’t generate so much as a whimper. We just shrugged our shoulders and moved on as if this was something that happens everyday. But only… it doesn’t.

It might be fair to say that we’ve become so used to watching her lose in the first rounds of big tournaments that many of us even wondered why she had not taken the step before. Sania’s singles rankings has slipped to 180, her injury troubles never seem to go away and staying fit seemed to be a genuine problem. She was finished a long time ago.

And this was happening even as her doubles ranking was going up at a manic pace. She is currently the 8th best doubles player in the world and has won 14 doubles titles in her career, compared to just 1 singles title. But how many of us look at her playing doubles and say that she preferred to take the easy way out.

How bad Sania is in our eyes is also a direct indication of how good we thought she could be. Of course, a lot of that was built up with the 2005 tennis season when her ranking jumped up from 326 to 31, largely on the back of a powerful forehand. She even got recognition from the WTA in the form of the Newcomer Of The Year.

Her movement wasn’t great even then but she could trade groundstrokes with the best in the business and that alone was more than what we could say about the rest of India’s tennis talent. There was scope for improvement – if her movement improved, if her volleying improved, if her backhand became more consistent… a lot of ‘ifs’ but a lot of hope too.

Greater talents have fallen away in the world of tennis but Sania was special for India. Perhaps still is.

Almost as soon as her first brilliant season in the big league ended – the number of children taking up the sport increased manifold. People started talking about tennis as a sport that mattered; people started talking about tennis even if they did not know the roles. They also spoke about her t-shirts – from the one that read: ‘Well-behaved women rarely make history’ at Wimbledon to the ‘I’m cute? No shit’ one that she wore at the US Open in September where she made it to the last 16 before losing to Maria Sharapova.

She was there and she had it all. ‘She is fearless about going for the shots,’ John McEnroe said after seeing her play at the US Open on 2005. ‘She just believes that all her shots will go in.’

Sania was being noticed in the right quarters but then came a flood of injuries that knocked her off her feet. Her comebacks to the game were short — the wrist injuries and the knee injuries kept recurring. Her fitness levels fell and then doubles happened.

She discovered at a certain level that it was easier to have a career on the tour if she played just doubles. But she is just 26 – is it too early to kill the dream? Or is it just a case of her wanting a life outside tennis?

Singles means dedication and unwavering discipline. It means training alone, thinking up tactics, improving the game and doing it all on your own. Is that the life that Sania wanted to leave? Did she want something that was not as tough but just as rewarding?

Doubles, on the other hand, with top players staying away except for the odd jaunt by the Williams sister is much easier to survive in. You can get into the main draw of Grand Slams and that means a good pay day is assured. Some would even say it’s easy money

In recent times, we’ve seen the likes of Kimiko Date return to the tour at the age of 37. Kim Clijsters and Justine Henin went away too only to realise that they couldn’t stay away. Perhaps it might happen with Sania too – but at the moment it looks unlikely. She’s focussed on wanting to improve her doubles rankings and has seen her limits in singles. And truth to be told, it’s rather sad.

She isn’t fearless anymore. She’s trying to do the right thing and even though it might be the right thing for her, one can’t help but wonder whether this is the end of the dream called Sania Mirza.

http://www.firstpost.com/sports/the-...am-293400.html

[dryrunguy]

The writer only makes a passing reference to how Sania was maligned in the press for what she wore, how she sat, etc. Remember the big deal over how she placed her feet during a changeover or something? (IIRC, she was resting them on something rather than flat on the ground, and it caused a big stir.)

Anyway, I guess I'll was wonder how all of that business happening on the side distracted her or weighed on her.

[munchin]

From Greg Sharko on Twitter: Since the beginning of 2005, Rafael Nadal is 214-8 on clay. 214 and 8. That is the craziest thing.

[Moose]

From Greg Sharko on Twitter: Since the beginning of 2005, Rafael Nadal is 214-8 on clay. 214 and 8. That is the craziest thing.

2 are to Nole, 2 to Roger. An unforgettable one to Robin at RG.

The other 3?

[Drop-shot]

2 are to Nole, 2 to Roger. An unforgettable one to Robin at RG.

The other 3?

1 was to Ferrero I believe in Rome when he had those blisters.

I know he lost to Gaudio in Bs As but not sure if it was after 2005.

I also think he lost his first ever match in Monte Carlo... maybe to Coria?

[Moose]

1 was to Ferrero I believe in Rome when he had those blisters.

I know he lost to Gaudio in Bs As but not sure if it was after 2005.

I also think he lost his first ever match in Monte Carlo... maybe to Coria?

I had to look them up, I admit. I had forgotten about Juanqui. I would not have had a guess on the other two, though Gaudio '05 is not a huge surprise.

JCF in Rome '08 R32 is #1.

Gaudio was #2 - Quarters at Buenos Aires in 2005.

That leaves one more - a surprising name for the list, if you ask me.

[shtexas]

He lost one to Andreev ('05?)

[Charlie02123]

The writer only makes a passing reference to how Sania was maligned in the press for what she wore, how she sat, etc. Remember the big deal over how she placed her feet during a changeover or something? (IIRC, she was resting them on something rather than flat on the ground, and it caused a big stir.)

Anyway, I guess I'll was wonder how all of that business happening on the side distracted her or weighed on her.

The drama was her feet being near a flag.

2 are to Nole, 2 to Roger. An unforgettable one to Robin at RG.

The other 3?

One is Ferrero during a year when the clay season was crammed together (2008 for Olympics?). I know he had shockingly lost to Moya but perhaps that was a hard court.

[Charlie02123]

He lost one to Andreev ('05?)

Oh yeah! Then he went on a crazy streak and writers kept blabbing "can you believe the last man to beat him on clay!?". QF of something.

[Ti-Amie]

[Moose]

He lost one to Andreev ('05?)

We have a winner

'05 Valencia Qs. Andreev went on to win the tournament.

[Woody]

In several Asian countries (including India I think) it is very disrespectful to show someone the soles of your feet. I'm guessing showing your soles to the flag would be pretty offensive.

[atlpam]

In the spirit of Random, a co-worker sent me a car license plate he saw:

ILOB10S