Search:

Type: Posts; User: craighickman

Search: Search took 0.18 seconds.

  1. Replies
    123
    Views
    35,063

    Re: Supreme Court Watch 2010-2011

    I don't have the case in front of me, of course, but I'd like to know why Kennedy ruled with the majority on this matter.
  2. Replies
    123
    Views
    35,063

    Re: Supreme Court Watch 2010-2011

    Thomas may be brilliant.

    But as a Supreme Court Justice, he's a disgrace.

    That is all.
  3. Replies
    123
    Views
    35,063

    Re: Supreme Court Watch 2010-2011

    I did read/hear about that story and it turns my stomach, for all sorts of reasons, obvious and not.

    But I don't believe judges more than rarely commit crimes for which they should be...
  4. Replies
    123
    Views
    35,063

    Re: Supreme Court Watch 2010-2011

    Nevermind what happened to Bill Clinton (though I understand why it's referenced here). What I don't understand is why it's unlikely Thomas will be disbarred or prosecuted? Color me naive, but...
  5. Replies
    123
    Views
    35,063

    Re: Supreme Court Watch 2010-2011

    That's an excellent history.

    Still, it seems to me, that Thomas' greatest problem was his failure to report sources of his wife's income for all those years. On that alone, he deserves more than a...
  6. Replies
    123
    Views
    35,063

    Re: Supreme Court Watch 2010-2011

    I'll refrain from calling Scalia out of his name.

    At least on this forum.
Results 1 to 6 of 6