The opinions expressed are not necessarily those of ProTennisNews.net, but rather of the individual authors.
If you know me or even just follow me here or on Twitter, you know that, most of the time, my brain is a cynical, sarcastic ball of skepticism (or whatever that brain shape is). I think The Secret is a brilliant scam and a miracle occurs when someone wishes for something really, really hard... and then goes to the store and buys it for themselves. But I am not a fan of adding invented negativity to our already oft-too-grey lives. And, lately, I have been struck by attempts to bring negative attention to tennis. This is probably a result of veiled, usually subconscious, attempts to make the sport more fun and interesting, and to introduce some controversy and attract fans of other sports. But tennis' appeal is not in its shortcomings, it's in the strength of the sport. The sport requires physical skills and commitment, talent, a strong mentality, extreme dedication and a certain level of intellect for players to succeed. And these assets are what we as the tennis community should focus on, not the negative minutia.
We are now getting closer to the first major of the year, and here are seven things we've learned in the first week of the 2013 tennis season.
1. What happens when 'burrowing through the match' is your tactic
For years, every knowledgeable tennis commentator and fan has been calling David Ferrer "underrated." The Spanish World No. 5 was able to shake the moniker a bit after winning his first Masters 1000 title at Bercy last fall, but perhaps we were too quick to let go of the epithet. On Tuesday of last week, at the Qatar ExxonMobil open in Doha, David Ferrer created a hole on the seemingly unbreakable hard court surface while moving back to return a shot. Perhaps we have been underestimating Ferrer's powers after all.
2. Don't play with fire
Argentina's Leonardo Mayer burned himself playing with fireworks during a New Year's celebration. Read the warning labels on those dynamite sticks, friends!
3. You never know when a new friendship will blossom
Perhaps it'll be a coach from romantic 'Pa-ree'; perhaps it'll be a younger cute boy (from a country) next door; maybe it'll be a quirky pop star who 'works out' and loves tennis; it might be a recently re-employed star athlete who's played in several Capitals; or another sportsman who carries a big golf stick. Whoever it might be, if you're a WTA star, there's probably a dude stalking you around the Tour.
This year, it is a tad more interesting.
It is properly called Olympus Mons. In Greek mythology, Mount Olympus was the residence of gods. And, unlike religions that came after, Olympus was forbidden to non-gods. After you died, you went somewhere, most likely Hades, but not Olympus. Zeus and his court were the only inhabitants there, and they were not in the habit of renting space.
Something about driving on the wrong side of the road, you know.
Don’t believe me? How about that brand new roof over the main stadium, err, Centre Court? If it were for aesthetics, they would have never put up that roof. Admit it: when closed, Centre Court looks from above as if it had been manufactured by Tupperware. And then, Google the photographs for the 2008 Rafael Nadal/Roger Federer final and the Pete Sampras/Patrick Rafter final, and try to find anything more beautiful than the last photos, when the shadows were deep and the contrasts gorgeous. No, that had to go. When your ratings go down because Goran Ivanisevic and Rafter played the final on Monday, it is time to invest a few hundred million quid to get some more.
The 2012 French Open is such a tournament. Almost all players who've entered it have high stakes running at Roland Garros Stadium, which makes the tournament preposterously appealing.
No player entered the event with more to win than Novak Djokovic. If he can hold the trophy aloft on the Third Sunday, he will achieve several milestones.
Golf is a game, and a wonderful one. Maddeningly difficult, it is addictive. It brings a lot of mixed feelings. Any golfer that has found himself deep in the rough has had the little devil on the left shoulder saying, “C’mon, just throw it out there on the fairway. No one will notice”.
Officially, I dislike golf. But on Sunday, April 8, I found myself glued to the TV during the final three holes of the Masters, watching Bubba Watson and Louis Oosthuizen slowly play out their drama. It was compelling, and I thought that what I experienced was maybe the same sensation that those people who do not follow tennis regularly got when they stumbled into the fifth set of the Djokovic-Nadal final at the Aussie Open (or, even better, the fifth set of Nadal-Federer at the 2008 Wimbledon final).
I was introduced to the greatness of live Grand Slam tennis way back in 1995, at the Wimbledon Championships. In awe of all things related to tennis and its history, I was witness to several great days of the best tennis in the world. In those halcyon days, the era of serve and volley was slowly coming to an end (in the men's field; the women had buried it already) but the sleek grass courts at Church Road were the last stronghold of that art. Coupled with the presence of Pete Sampras, Goran Ivanisevic, Boris Becker and Stefan Edberg, the pace of play was fast and relentless. And amid the many things I recall I got from those two weeks was the appreciation that tennis is a sport of commitment.
Not only the type of commitment that I will dub "MACRO commitment," the commitment that every young player that dreams of tennis glory has to make early in his or her life, that particular dedication of several hours a day needed to properly hone a forehand, learn a backhand to the point of automation, and understand the geometry of a court. I refer also to "MICRO commitments," the instantaneous decisions that a player must make when he or she decides on what stroke to hit, where and how. The fast courts of Wimbledon, in 1995 not yet slowed down to increase the length of rallies, were the epitome of the fast decisionmaking process that a tennis player must go through when the ball is in play.
No doubt was left, either, that Nadal had lost the match.
And we are glad.
Excuse me for the familiar tone, which may be misconstrued as disrespectful. But it is just that you are really not that awe-inspiring. Yes, you are a Grand Slam, and yes, you have a wonderful history, but you really have that aura that you are not stuffy or, heaven forbid, a snob.
Seriously. You are officially known as the KIA Australian Open, and, no offense - KIA makes some very good cars, but can you picture Wimbledon being named The KIA Championships? Heck, they would probably balk at being known as The Rolls Royce Championships.